The managed service requires a software tier you would not otherwise buy
ASO agency review · September 2026
App Radar review: the agency is a sales channel for the software. Avoid paying for both.
App Radar began in Graz in 2015 as an ASO tool, added managed services, and was acquired by SplitMetrics in 2023. It still operates under its own brand with its own agency arm. When a software company runs an agency, the agency has a purpose beyond your listing: it is the highest-touch way to sell and retain subscriptions. That shapes what you get.
Thinking about hiring App Radar’s agency? Avoid. Let me explain what a tool-owned agency is for.
Gabriel Machuret · September 2026App Radar is a tool first. It was founded in Graz in 2015 by Thomas Kriebernegg and Christian Janesch as ASO software, it acquired the Spanish tool TheTool, and in November 2023 it was itself acquired by SplitMetrics, another software company. It is a good product. It also has an agency arm that offers managed ASO and paid campaigns, and the agency arm is what this page is about, because its economics are unlike a normal agency’s.
When a software company runs an agency, the agency is a channel. Every managed client is a subscription seat that does not churn, a case study for the product, and a lead for the upsell to a bigger tier. The service itself does not need to be highly profitable; it needs to keep the client inside the platform. That is why tool-owned agencies are often reasonably priced and why they always run the work through their own dashboard. You are not just hiring people. You are being onboarded.
This has a practical effect on the work. A tool-owned agency thinks in the tool’s categories: keyword tracking, visibility scores, ranking history, automated suggestions. Those are useful inputs. They are not judgment. The decision about what claim your first screenshot should make, or which three terms belong in your title, or whether the honest answer is that your listing is fine and your product is the problem, does not come from a dashboard. It comes from a person who has read your reviews and opened your competitors. Tool-led work drifts toward what the tool can measure, which is rankings, and away from what you want, which is installs.
Then there is the ownership. App Radar is now a brand inside SplitMetrics, which also runs its own growth services. Two agency arms inside one software group means account plans, cross-selling and margin targets that serve the group, not your listing. None of this is sinister. It is what acquisitions produce. It does mean the agency you hire is one node in a larger system with its own incentives.
Compare that with hiring one consultant who does not own a tool and does not want to sell you one. I use whatever data source is right for your category, and I hand your team a cheap subscription they can run themselves when we finish. The listing is torn down, rewritten, tested once with a clean hypothesis, and handed over with the reasoning your team will need. The fee is fixed, it ends, and nothing in it is designed to keep you inside a platform.
In fairness: if you already use App Radar’s software, like it, and want the people who built it to run your account in it, the managed service is a coherent choice and the pricing reflects that it is a channel. If you want independent judgment on your listing and the freedom to use any tool afterward, a tool-owned agency is the wrong shape. Send me their proposal and I will show you what the work costs without the subscription attached.
02 — Red flags in a tool-owned proposal
If you see three, send it to meDeliverables described in the tool’s vocabulary: visibility score, tracked keywords, alerts
Success defined as ranking movement rather than search installs
Group services (SplitMetrics) appearing in an App Radar proposal
No named person responsible for your title and subtitle
A minimum term that matches the subscription, not the work
03 — What the dashboard says vs what your listing needs
Three things to translate before you signData-driven ASO
Driven by the tool’s data: rankings, visibility scores, automated suggestions. Inputs, not judgment. Tool-led work drifts toward what the tool measures.
Rankings ≠ installsManaged service
Managed inside the platform, by the platform’s people, reported through the platform. You are a subscription that does not churn.
You are being onboardedPart of SplitMetrics
Two agency arms inside one software group. Account plans and cross-sell targets serve the group. Your listing is one node.
Group incentives04 — Where a tool-owned agency fee actually goes
Typical agency economics · illustrative, not their booksSoftware & engineering. The product is the company. Its engineers, servers and roadmap are funded by every seat, including managed ones.
Subscription growth & retention. The managed service exists to sell and keep seats. That is a sales cost, on your invoice.
Group overhead. SplitMetrics’ management, finance and sales infrastructure, allocated to every brand.
Account management. Your point of contact, running the dashboard and the monthly export.
Hands on your listing. The specialist actually changing your store, working in the tool. About a quarter.
05 — App Radar vs one consultant
Same goal: more installs from searchOption A — App Radar
A software product with an agency channel, owned by SplitMetrics
Their platform
A specialist inside the tool company
Managed service plus subscription
≈ $54,000 at a typical $4.5k/mo, plus the seat
Dashboard exports
Cancel the service; the subscription pitch continues
Option B — Gabriel, direct Live
One consultant, no product to sell
Whatever tool fits your category; yours afterward
Gabriel, on every deliverable
Fixed scope, fixed fee
$9,500, one engagement
A changelog: what shipped, what it did to installs
Your team runs ASO with a tool they choose
06 — Fair play — what App Radar genuinely does well
Credit where it is due- The software is good, and the team knows it better than anyone
- Managed pricing is often fair precisely because the service is a channel
- Being part of a larger group means the product is not going away
07 — Should you avoid App Radar’s agency?
Honest answer: depends who you areAvoid if
You want judgment on your listing, not a dashboard run for youYou do not want to be tied to a software subscriptionSuccess for you is installs, not visibility scoresYou want your team to choose its own tools afterwardHire them if
You already use and like App Radar’s softwareYou want the product’s own people running your account inside itYou value a group-backed vendor over an independent one07 — Before you sign
Send me
App Radar’s
proposal.
I will separate the service from the subscription, tell you what the listing needs regardless of tool, and quote it as a fixed fee. If their managed service genuinely fits you, I will say so.
08 — Objections
“Isn’t working inside a good tool an advantage?” +
For tracking, yes. For deciding what your listing should say, no. Tools narrow options; people choose. Ask who chooses on your account and how many other accounts they are choosing for.
“We already pay for App Radar.” +
Then the managed service is at least coherent. Ask whether the managed work would differ from what a good consultant could do in the same tool, and compare the totals.
“Can you work in our existing tool?” +
Yes. I use whatever fits, and I hand over a setup your team can run. No platform loyalty.
“Is this review biased?” +
Yes. I compete for ASO work. That is why the argument is about tool-owned agency economics, not competence, and why I have said who it suits.