ASO agency review · September 2026

Appbooster review: ‘boost campaigns’ next to ASO. Avoid until you know what is being boosted.

Appbooster, founded in 2013 and headquartered in Armenia, sells boost campaigns, ASO, mobile A/B tests, Apple Search Ads and app review and rating improvements, and says it has promoted more than 600 apps to the top of the stores. The phrase to interrogate is ‘boost campaign’. Depending on what it means in practice, you are either buying media or buying a policy problem.

Thinking about hiring Appbooster? Avoid, until you have asked one question.

Gabriel Machuret · September 2026

Appbooster has been around since 2013, which is a long time in this industry, and its site describes a service mix that looks like many others: ASO, A/B testing, Apple Search Ads. Two lines on that list are different in kind from the others, and this page is mostly about them. The first is ‘boost campaigns’. The second is ‘app reviews and rating improvements’. Neither is a standard ASO deliverable, and both need a precise definition before you sign anything.

A boost campaign, in the industry’s ordinary usage, is a burst of installs driven to an app over a short period to push it up the charts or up a keyword ranking. The installs can come from legitimate paid media, in which case it is simply an aggressive user acquisition campaign with a chart-position goal. Or they can come from incentivised or operated sources, in which case it is the thing Apple’s guidelines and Google’s policies prohibit under the heading of manipulating placement. The word boost covers both. The price usually tells you which one you are buying, because real media at real volume costs more than what most boost campaigns are sold for.

‘Rating improvement’ deserves the same question. There are legitimate ways to improve ratings: prompting satisfied users at the right moment, replying to reviews, fixing the bugs that generate one-star feedback. There are illegitimate ways: purchased or incentivised reviews. Both fit under the same three words on a services page. If the proposal specifies a number of reviews or a target star rating with a delivery date, you have your answer.

Why does this matter even if you only buy the ASO? Because the store’s enforcement lands on the app, not on the vendor. An account that has bought boosted installs or reviews is flagged, and every later organic change is judged in that light. A legitimate rewrite of your title can be suppressed because of an install pattern from six months earlier. Working with a vendor whose other product line is ranking manipulation attaches that risk to your developer account, whichever line you thought you were buying.

Real ASO is the slow version. A properly rewritten title, subtitle and keyword field. One screenshot hypothesis tested against another. Patience while the stores respond, and then the next change. It compounds, it is within the rules, and it is what I do on a fixed scope for a fixed fee. If your category rewards chart position, I will show you how apps genuinely reach it, and it is never a bought burst.

In fairness: it is possible that Appbooster’s boost campaigns are legitimate paid media with a chart goal, and their long tenure suggests they have kept out of serious trouble. The only way to know is to ask, in writing, where the installs come from and whether reviews are sourced from real users of your app without incentive. If the answers are clean, they are a budget option with a long history. If the answers are vague, keep your developer account. Send me their proposal and I will read it with you.

02Where a boost-plus-ASO budget actually goes

Typical agency economics · illustrative, not their books
$30,000a year at a typical $2,500/month retainer$23,400of it never touches your app store listing
30%

Install sourcing for boosts

Wherever the boost installs come from, media or otherwise, this is the cost of producing them.

14%

Review & rating operations

Whatever process delivers ‘rating improvement’ on a schedule.

16%

Sales & platform

The site, the pipeline and the account team.

18%

Margin

The owners’ return on products with little delivery risk to the vendor.

22%

Lasting improvement to your listing

The ASO and A/B work that actually changes your store. Less than a quarter.

03Appbooster vs one consultant

Same goal: more installs from search

Option A — Appbooster

What is sold

Boosts, ratings, ASO, A/B tests, Search Ads

Store policy exposure

Depends on the answer to one question

Who carries the risk

Your developer account

Contract

Campaigns plus retainer

12-month cost

≈ $30,000 at $2.5k/mo, plus campaign budgets

Effect on real metrics

Boosted installs weaken retention signals

When it ends

The boost fades

Option B — Gabriel, direct Live

What is sold

A rewritten listing, a tested claim, a handover

Store policy exposure

None

Who carries the risk

Nobody

Contract

Fixed scope, fixed fee

12-month cost

$9,500, one engagement

Effect on real metrics

Conversion improves, which drives ranking

When it ends

Your team runs ASO without me

04Questions to ask before signing anything

If you see three, send it to me
  1. Where, specifically, do boost campaign installs come from?
  2. Are reviews sourced from real, uncompensated users of my app?
  3. Is there a target star rating or review count with a delivery date?
  4. What happened to retention for the apps ‘taken to the top’?
  5. Does the ASO work depend on the boost to show results?
  6. Will you put the answers to the above in the contract?

05What the services page says vs what to ask

Hover a row to unredact

Boost campaign

A burst of installs toward a chart or keyword position. Legitimate media or operated installs, under one word. The price is the tell.

Translation: Ask where installs come from

Rating improvement

Prompting real users at the right moment, or sourcing reviews. A target star rating with a delivery date tells you which.

Translation: Ask who writes the reviews

600+ apps to the top

Chart peaks are easy to buy and hard to keep. Ask how many of those apps are still there, and what their retention looked like the month after.

Translation: Peaks are not positions

06Should you avoid Appbooster?

Honest answer: depends who you are

Avoid if

You cannot get a written answer on where boost installs come fromAny review or rating target has a delivery dateYou care about your developer account more than a chart peakYou want ranking that lasts longer than the campaign

Hire them if

The answers to the questions above are clean and in writingYou want budget Search Ads and A/B testing with a long-tenured teamYou understand exactly what you are buying and it is legitimate media

07Fair play — what to say for Appbooster

Credit where it is due

07 — Before you sign

Send me
Appbooster’s
proposal.

I will read it with you, mark the lines that need a written answer, and quote the legitimate listing work as a fixed fee. If their boosts turn out to be real media and the price makes sense, I will say so.

One reply from Gabriel. Same scope, fixed fee, or an honest ‘sign with them’.

08 — Objections

Is a boost campaign always against the rules?+

No. Real paid media aimed at a chart position is legitimate. Operated or incentivised installs are not. The word covers both, and the price and the source tell you which.

We only want the ASO, not the boosts.+

Then ask for a scope with the boosts and rating services removed, in writing. And consider whether you want your account associated with a vendor whose other line is what the stores police.

Can you get us to the top of the charts?+

Not by buying installs. If your category rewards chart position, I will show you how apps genuinely get there. It is slower and it lasts.

Is this review biased?+

I compete for ASO work, yes. This page is mostly about a definition, and the definition matters more than the competition.

Appbooster quoted you? Ask where the installs come from.Send their proposal