ASO agency review · September 2026

AppInChina review: publishing into China, not ASO. Avoid the category confusion.

AppInChina was founded in Beijing in 2013 by Rich Bishop and Shlomo Freund to publish international apps, software and games into the Chinese market: localisation, licensing, hosting, compliance, distribution across China’s many Android stores. It appears on ASO agency lists because it optimises store listings as part of that. It is a market-entry business, and buying it for ASO is buying the wrong thing well.

Thinking about hiring AppInChina for ASO? Avoid, unless you actually mean China. Let me explain.

Gabriel Machuret · September 2026

AppInChina is on this site because it turns up on lists of ASO agencies, and it turns up on those lists because part of what it does is optimise app store listings. But if you found it while looking for someone to fix your App Store or Google Play presence, you have found the wrong company for a good reason. AppInChina is a market-entry publisher. Its job is to get an international app into China, a market with no Google Play, dozens of Android stores, its own licensing regime and a legal environment that requires a local entity. That is a real, difficult service, and it is not App Store Optimisation.

Here is what the confusion costs. An ASO engagement is about one or two storefronts you already sell in, where the levers are title, subtitle, keyword field, screenshots and conversion, and where the goal is more organic installs from search. A China publishing engagement is about a dozen storefronts you cannot access without a partner, where the levers are licences, compliance, local hosting and relationships with store operators, and where the goal is to exist at all. The listing optimisation inside that is a small step at the end of a long process, done in Chinese, for Chinese stores. It tells you nothing about how to fix your English listing on iOS.

AppInChina’s fee structure reflects its real job. Publishing into China involves recurring costs for hosting, compliance, licence maintenance and the ongoing relationship with stores, so a retainer makes sense, and it is not small. Clients like The Economist, Speedtest and Withings pay it because China is a market worth entering properly. If your app is not planning to enter China, every line of that structure is irrelevant to you, and the ASO element you were looking for is a footnote to a service you do not need.

There is also a subtler trap. Some founders discover AppInChina, realise China is a huge market, and let the discovery become a strategy. Entering China is a serious decision involving a local entity, data rules, content review and an operating commitment. It should be made deliberately, after your home-market listing is working. Fixing the listing you already have is the cheap, fast, high-return move. China is the expensive, slow, high-risk one. Do them in that order.

Compare that with hiring one consultant whose job is the storefronts you actually sell in. A teardown, a rewrite, one creative test, and a handover, on a fixed date. If, after that, China is the right next market, I will say so, and AppInChina is one of the few companies I would send you to for it. The fee for the listing work is fixed and small, and it does not involve a local entity.

In fairness, this is one of the pages on this site with the least criticism in it. AppInChina appears to do a hard job well, its founders have been in Beijing doing it since 2013, and its client list is serious. It is simply not an ASO agency, and buying it as one is a category error. Send me your listing, and if China is genuinely part of your plan, I will tell you when it makes sense to call them.

02What the list placement says vs what the company does

Hover a row to unredact

ASO agency

On the lists because listing optimisation is a step in publishing. The step is small, in Chinese, for Chinese stores. It is not the service you searched for.

Translation: Wrong list

China market entry

The real service: licences, compliance, hosting, distribution across many Android stores. Hard, valuable, and irrelevant unless China is in your plan.

Translation: The actual job

Serious client list

The Economist, Speedtest, Withings. Companies that decided to enter China deliberately. If you have not made that decision, their reasons are not yet yours.

Translation: Decide China first

03Where a China-publishing retainer actually goes

Typical agency economics · illustrative, not their books
$36,000a year at a typical $3,000/month retainer$30,240of it never touches your app store listing

Compliance, licensing & legal. The real work of existing in China as a foreign app. Ongoing, necessary, and nothing to do with your home-market listing.

Hosting & local infrastructure. China requires local hosting and data handling. A recurring cost inside the retainer.

Store relationships & distribution. Dozens of Android stores, each with its own review and relationship.

Account management & margin. Beijing team coordination across time zones, and the owners’ return.

Store listing optimisation. The Chinese-language listing work at the end of the process. A small step, and not the one you were looking for.

04Signs you are about to buy the wrong service

If you see three, send it to me
  1. You searched for ASO and are reading a China publishing proposal
  2. Your home-market listing has never been properly rewritten or tested
  3. China entry is being considered because the vendor exists, not because your data points there
  4. No local-entity or compliance discussion has happened yet
  5. The listing optimisation is the only line you understand on the proposal
  6. You expect the engagement to affect your English App Store ranking

05AppInChina vs one consultant

Same goal: more installs from search
AppInChinaGabriel, direct
The jobPublishing your app into ChinaFixing the listings you already have
StorefrontsDozens of Chinese Android storesApp Store and Google Play in your markets
LeversLicences, compliance, hosting, relationshipsTitle, first screenshot, conversion, patience
ContractPublishing retainer plus costsFixed scope, fixed fee
12-month cost≈ $36,000 at a typical $3k/mo, plus entity and compliance costs$9,500, one engagement
When to use themAfter your home listing works and China is a deliberate decisionNow
When it endsIt does not, while you are in ChinaYour team runs ASO without me

06Fair play — what AppInChina genuinely does well

Credit where it is due

07Should you avoid AppInChina?

Honest answer: depends who you are

Avoid if

You are looking for App Store Optimisation in your current marketsYour home listing is not yet workingChina is not a deliberate, data-backed decisionYou expect the work to affect your iOS or Google Play ranking

Hire them if

You have decided, deliberately, to enter ChinaYour home-market listing is already performingYou need licensing, compliance and distribution handled by people who know the market

07 — Before you sign

Send me
your listing
first.

I will fix the storefronts you already sell in, on a fixed fee, and tell you honestly whether China is the right next step. If it is, I will say when to call AppInChina.

One reply from Gabriel. Same scope, fixed fee, or an honest ‘sign with them’.

08 — Objections

Is AppInChina an ASO agency at all?+

Not in the usual sense. Listing optimisation is one step inside a China publishing service. It does not touch your App Store or Google Play ranking in your current markets.

Should we enter China?+

Only as a deliberate decision, after your home listing is working, with a clear view of the legal and operating commitment. It is not a growth hack.

Can you do ASO for Chinese stores?+

No. That market needs a local partner, and AppInChina is one of the few credible ones. I do the storefronts you already sell in.

Is this review biased?+

I compete for ASO work, yes, but not with AppInChina. This page is about a category error, and it credits them for the job they actually do.

Considering China? Fix your home listing first.Send their proposal