ASO agency review · September 2026

REPLUG review: paid UA is the engine. Avoid buying ASO from the passenger seat.

REPLUG was founded in Berlin in 2020 by Lorenzo Rossi and Luca Mastrorocco, two adtech veterans, and it has grown fast with clients like Bolt and Doctolib. Its DNA is paid user acquisition, measurement and attribution. ASO is on the menu, and it is competently done. It is also the least profitable thing they sell, and that shapes how much of the agency you actually get.

Thinking about hiring REPLUG for ASO? Avoid. Let me explain what adtech DNA means for your listing.

Gabriel Machuret · September 2026

REPLUG is a young agency that has done well quickly, and it is worth understanding why. Its founders came out of adtech, the world of attribution, tracking SDKs and media buying, and they built an agency that speaks that language fluently. Measurement, incrementality, MMP setup, paid UA across a dozen channels. For a company drowning in ad spend it cannot attribute, that is exactly the right team. This page is about something else: hiring them for App Store Optimization.

An agency’s DNA decides where its best people go and where its margin comes from. At REPLUG, both point at paid. Media buying scales with budget, attribution work commands consulting rates, and the senior team’s expertise is in exactly those things. ASO, by contrast, is a fixed-fee, slow-moving, craft-heavy service. It does not scale with spend and it does not need an MMP. At an adtech-shaped agency it is a supporting service: useful for winning full-funnel accounts, staffed by whoever is good at it, and rarely where the founders spend their time.

You see this in how the work is framed. ASO is presented as one part of a growth system, with paid, CRM and measurement around it. That framing is true and also convenient. It makes the organic work hard to evaluate on its own, because the report is about the system. Installs went up: was that the metadata change or the new TikTok campaign? The agency that runs both has no reason to separate them, and every reason to keep the retainer covering both.

There is also the age of the shop. Founded in 2020, REPLUG has built its process in the years since. That means the process is modern, which is good, and it means the ASO playbook is a few years old and was built to fit alongside paid, which is less good. The stores have their own logic. A listing rewrite is judged by conversion and search visibility over weeks, not by a dashboard refreshed daily. An agency whose habits were formed in daily-refresh media buying will always find organic work slow, and slow work gets less attention.

Compare that with hiring one consultant whose only habit is the stores. No media, no attribution stack, no growth system to sell you. The teardown, the rewrite, one creative test at a time, the handover. You can see exactly what the organic work did because nothing else is moving in the report. The fee is fixed and small next to a year of agency retainers, and when it ends your team can run the next round without an agency or an SDK.

To be fair to REPLUG: if you need paid UA, measurement and CRM built properly, they are a serious, modern option and the adtech background is a genuine advantage there. If you want your store listing fixed by someone for whom that is the whole job, the DNA works against you. Send me their proposal and I will show you what the ASO line would take on its own, and what it costs as a fixed fee.

02REPLUG vs one consultant

Same goal: more installs from search
REPLUGGabriel, direct
DNAAdtech: paid UA, attribution, measurementApp stores: listings, keywords, creative tests
Who does the workAn ASO specialist inside a paid-first teamGabriel, on every deliverable
ContractMonthly retainer, usually covering paid tooFixed scope, fixed fee
12-month cost≈ $72,000 at a typical $6k/mo, before ad spend$9,500, one engagement
ReportingCombined growth dashboardA changelog: what shipped, what it did to search installs
Also for salePaid UA, CRM, measurement, creativeNothing. One category, one strategy.
When it endsRenewal, and the attribution stack stays theirs to runYour team runs ASO without me

03Where an adtech-agency retainer actually goes

Typical agency economics · illustrative, not their books
$72,000a year at a typical $6,000/month retainer$53,280of it never touches your app store listing

Media & measurement infrastructure. Attribution tooling, media buying platforms, analysts. The core business, funded by every retainer.

Senior adtech expertise. The founders’ time goes where it is worth most: paid strategy and measurement, not metadata.

Account management. Your point of contact, coordinating paid, organic and CRM into one report.

Berlin office & margin. Overhead, tools, and the owners’ return.

Organic work on your listing. The ASO specialist actually changing your store. About a quarter.

04What ‘full growth system’ says vs what your listing gets

Hover a row to unredact

Mobile growth system

Paid, organic, CRM and measurement as one machine. It is a real offer. It also means your organic results are never reported on their own, and the retainer never covers only the part you need.

Translation: Systems hide the parts

Adtech veterans

Deep expertise in attribution and media buying. Those skills are the reason to hire them for paid. They are not the skills that rewrite a subtitle or design a screenshot test.

Translation: Right DNA, wrong job

Data-driven ASO

Daily dashboards and MMP data feel rigorous. The stores move in weeks. Organic work evaluated on a media buyer’s clock always looks slow, and slow work gets less senior attention.

Translation: Wrong clock

05Red flags in a growth-system proposal

If you see three, send it to me
  1. ASO priced only as part of a paid UA retainer
  2. Measurement or MMP setup as a prerequisite for organic work
  3. Organic results reported inside a blended growth dashboard
  4. The founders on the call, an ASO associate on the delivery plan
  5. A creative refresh proposed to serve paid campaigns first, the store page second
  6. A minimum term matched to the media contract

06Should you avoid REPLUG?

Honest answer: depends who you are

Avoid if

You want ASO on its own, evaluated on its ownYou do not need paid UA or attribution work right nowYour organic budget is under $50k a yearYou want your team to learn the store work

Hire them if

You have a paid budget that needs proper measurement and buyingYou want paid, organic and CRM run as one system by one teamYou value adtech fluency over store-page craft

07Fair play — what REPLUG genuinely does well

Credit where it is due

07 — Before you sign

Send me
REPLUG’s
proposal.

I will separate the organic work from the paid and measurement lines, tell you what the listing work would take on its own, and quote it as a fixed fee. If you need the growth system, I will say so.

One reply from Gabriel. Same scope, fixed fee, or an honest ‘sign with them’.

08 — Objections

Isn’t paid and organic together the modern approach?+

It is the agency approach. It is convenient for reporting and for retainers. Your listing still has to be fixed by one person making good decisions, and that piece does not need a growth system around it.

Their measurement expertise must help ASO.+

Attribution tells you where paid installs came from. Organic search visibility and conversion are measured in the store consoles, which your team already has. Different tools, different clock.

Can you set up our attribution?+

No. I do the listing, the keywords, the creative testing and the training. If you need adtech work done well, REPLUG is a real option for it.

Is this review biased?+

Yes. I compete for ASO work. That is why the argument is about agency DNA and where attention goes, not about competence, and why I have said clearly what they are good at.

REPLUG quoted you? Organic only, judged on its own.Send their proposal