# ASO Metadata Review: Compare Coverage and Resolve Gaps

Review the proposal against its research record and separate completeness checks from evidence of performance.

App:
Store / locale:
Source scope / sample:
Owner / review date:

## Your ASO assignment

1. Review every approved candidate’s field coverage in A and B. Inspect at least one case where words are present but their context is weak.

Your response and evidence reference:

2. Open the unresolved evidence list and resolve or defer each flagged approved candidate. Review rejected candidates for clear exclusion reasons.

Your response and evidence reference:

3. Write a post-release observation plan naming the metric, comparison period, locale, owner and concurrent changes to record.

Your response and evidence reference:

## Handover criteria

- [ ] Baseline and proposed metadata comparison
  Supporting source:
  Remaining gap:
- [ ] Resolved decisions and explicit remaining gaps
  Supporting source:
  Remaining gap:
- [ ] Approval criteria and post-release observation plan
  Supporting source:
  Remaining gap:

## Self-check

Installs rise after metadata and screenshots change together. Can the team attribute the increase to keywords alone?

Your answer:

## Approval and next decision

Decision:
Reason:
Owner:
Review date: