ASO AgencyHealth & fitness · US iPhone listing
Does their ASO suck?
Listing creative score · first three captured iPhone screenshots
5/10Fine. A dangerous place to stop.
Strava puts recognition first, social reactions second and the tracking job third. A newcomer should not have to sit through the awards ceremony to understand how to record a walk. The community needs an activity to gather around.
Gab’s verdict · 5/10Gabriel Machuret
One storefront, one language and a dated capture. This is an independent editorial audit, not a client case study.
Gab’s take · Five criteria. Two points each.
Routes and community response are specific, useful evidence. Keep the social personality. The recording experience should introduce the app before the award does. Show one recording, its route and the actual community response in that order. Keep recognition secondary. A watch award does not explain the first useful phone experience.
The activity and community context gives a relevant fitness proposition, although the award-led opener delays the first practical tracking benefit.
Community and routes appear without one completed recording action.
Dark small interfaces and watch imagery compete for attention.
Recognition, reactions and tracking run in an unhelpful order.
Activity discussion is specific but the newcomer entry is underexplained.
0: not earned · 1: useful but incomplete · 2: clearly demonstrated. Judged on the dated opening creative; public metadata provides context. These points assess creative execution, not private conversion or ranking performance. Read the scoring criteria · See all ten verdict levels
Inspect the numbered original, read the problem, then compare the proposed fix. The publisher’s creative stays unchanged.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The first frame combines an award claim with watch-led imagery.
Why I’m flagging it: Watch-led recognition occupies the opener above small interface detail.
Lead with an authentic run, ride or walk recording benefit.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: Comments, reactions and an activity discussion make the social feature concrete.
Why I’m flagging it: Comments demonstrate community without an understandable first recording.
Connect the discussion to the same captured activity and enlarge the useful interaction.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The third frame connects a route visualization with choosing an activity type.
Why I’m flagging it: Route and sport selection should establish the earlier story.
Move the recording action forward and finish with its actual route summary.
Proposed copy for discussion. These are not current listing fields or tested winners.
Observed listing
Track & share with friends
Proposed alternative
Track activity. Find a crew.
Name 23/30 · Subtitle 28/30 charactersThe candidate keeps activity breadth while turning the social promise into a more conversational invitation.
The tradeoff: Crew is less literal than friends and may feel less welcoming to a solo beginner. Validate the tone with intended users; it is a copy hypothesis, not a proven improvement.
Read the sequence from top to bottom on mobile, left to right on desktop. These are message-layout sketches, not screens from Strava or tested results.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: An approved current phone recording screen with clear activity selection.
Why it earns the space: Show that a first session has a simple starting point.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: A current route or activity summary with readable values.
Why it earns the space: Connect recording with a useful outcome without promising perfect GPS accuracy.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: The genuine community interaction screen.
Why it earns the space: Finish with the social distinction rather than treating it as a separate product.
The test: Does showing the recording interface earlier improve default-page download conversion? The sketch gives the designer a direction; the actual product and access conditions decide what can ship.
Bring the listing. I’ll help you decide what to keep, what to fix and what to test.
Observed competitor metadata
Workout App & Distance Tracker
Nike Run Club foregrounds running and coaching.
The lesson: A narrower activity promise can be more immediate. Strava needs to make its breadth understandable without becoming vague.
Observed competitor metadata
Running App and Training Plans
Runkeeper uses its metadata for tracking and training-plan language.
The lesson: Functional clarity is a baseline to compare, not evidence that its acquisition performance is stronger.
Observed competitor metadata
GPS Hiking & Biking Trail Maps
AllTrails puts trail maps and outdoor discovery into its metadata.
The lesson: For a walker, discovering where to go may be a different job from recording and sharing. Do not treat all walking intent as interchangeable.
Intent candidates grounded in the listing—not fabricated search-volume or difficulty scores.
Visitor’s job: Record an activity and see its data.
Evidence: The name and third screenshot support activity recording.
Decision: Preserve functional language even when creative emphasizes community.
Visitor’s job: Record everyday walks or build an activity habit.
Evidence: Walking is in the name, but the sampled creative leans toward running.
Decision: Investigate as a specific audience; do not assume a missing walking-led frame proves lost installs.
Visitor’s job: Stay connected and motivated through other people.
Evidence: The subtitle and second screenshot directly show this distinction.
Decision: Keep the social benefit visible; avoid replacing it with generic tracking copy.
The unseen keyword field may already cover some of these terms. Build an evidence-backed keyword shortlist before making a metadata change.
Three displayed reviews were selected for recording, sharing and paid-value questions. All three are from 2019–2020. They are historical expectation signals and must not be presented as reports of current bugs or current pricing.
Sample: 3 selected accounts from 8 displayed reviews. Dates: 27 July 2019–27 December 2020. No sentiment percentage is calculated.
27 December 2020 · 5/5 stars
“keep in touch”
Despite its five-star rating, this review questions paid value and describes using the app for running friends.
What I’d investigate: Read the text instead of treating the star rating as sentiment. Verify current feature access before drawing a pricing conclusion.
Listing review source · Review ID 679748479527 July 2019 · 4/5 stars
“tracking the distance”
The reviewer values activity data and sharing but reports notification and segment frustrations at that time.
What I’d investigate: Recording and social interactions are both useful message territories. The old complaints require fresh reproduction before becoming product findings.
Listing review source · Review ID 452587107227 July 2020 · 3/5 stars
“accurate record”
The reviewer describes historical tracking problems and disappointment with activity records.
What I’d investigate: Avoid absolute accuracy claims. This does not establish that the current app has the same issue.
Listing review source · Review ID 6248726215A displayed review can be old, unusually positive or internally inconsistent with its star rating. These accounts suggest questions; they do not establish current defects or typical customer experience. Use the Review Research Desk to keep evidence and interpretation separate.
Watch-led recognition occupies the opener above small interface detail.
Deliverable: Lead with an authentic supported run, ride or walk recording benefit.
Creative brief and current-product checkComments demonstrate community without an understandable first recording.
Deliverable: Connect the discussion to the same captured activity and enlarge the useful interaction.
Creative brief and current-product checkRoute and sport selection should establish the earlier story.
Deliverable: Move the supported recording action forward and finish with its actual route summary.
Creative brief and current-product checkDoes showing the recording interface earlier improve default-page download conversion?
Check Apple’s current product page optimization guidance and custom product page guidance before configuring a test. Write your experiment brief.
1–3: thumbs down · 4–6: thumbs up and down · 7–10: thumbs up
The basics need a serious rethink.
Too many obvious things have been left unfinished.
There is a useful product here. The listing needs to show it.
Some basics work, but the opening wastes attention and under-explains the benefit.
There is usable creative here, but too much of the sales argument is left to the visitor.
Real strengths, undermined by meaningful gaps in the opening story or execution.
A clear, useful demonstration with specific refinements still needed.
The main promise is clear and supported. Refinement matters more than reinvention.
Clear positioning, thoughtful choices and very few loose ends.
An unusually clear, convincing storefront worth learning from.
An editorial verdict on the captured storefront, not a measured ASO score or an assessment of an agency’s private work.
No private analytics, search-rank dataset or internal keyword field was supplied. Review quotations are short excerpts; explanations are our summaries. App names and screenshots belong to their respective owners. We are not affiliated with Strava. Read our editorial methodology.
Your app. Your priorities.
Send your listing, market and the problem you want to solve. I’ll explain the scope and fee before work starts. Your budget should buy decisions, not a longer PDF.
Build a relevant keyword shortlist, plan your screenshot sequence or get help with the creative decisions.
