ASO AgencyProductivity & AI · US iPhone listing
Does their ASO suck?
Listing creative score · first three captured iPhone screenshots
Motion's opener has AI attached to practically everything, including agents labelled coming soon. That is a roadmap wearing a sales badge. The phone's actual job deserves a clearer introduction than this capability inventory.
Gab’s verdict · 3/10Gabriel Machuret
One storefront, one language and a dated capture. This is an independent editorial audit, not a client case study.
Gab’s take · Five criteria. Two points each.
The task form shows that there is a real product behind the AI language. Start from that. A scheduling app should let me see the schedule, not leave the result to my imagination. A platform claim, navigation hub and task form do not demonstrate scheduling value. Show an task becoming a reviewable schedule, and explain desktop dependencies clearly. Future features should not be carrying today's install argument.
The task and scheduling context establishes a relevant productivity use case, but platform and AI labels make the concrete mobile benefit harder to identify.
A task form appears, but the scheduling result is not demonstrated.
Dense lists and full-screen forms dilute readable hierarchy.
A feature list, hub and form do not complete one task.
Number-one and productivity language supply assertions rather than demonstrated advantage.
0: not earned · 1: useful but incomplete · 2: clearly demonstrated. Judged on the dated opening creative; public metadata provides context. These points assess creative execution, not private conversion or ranking performance. Read the scoring criteria · See all ten verdict levels
Inspect the numbered original, read the problem, then compare the proposed fix. The publisher’s creative stays unchanged.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The creative is a platform claim and capability list rather than a working phone screen.
Why I’m flagging it: A long AI list includes an unreleased capability instead of phone-level proof.
Replace it with one currently mobile task and a specific benefit.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The phone presents a hub for accessing several kinds of work.
Why I’m flagging it: Recent items and workspaces demonstrate access, not completed work.
Show the same task moving from capture into its scheduling flow.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The example exposes scheduling inputs and a scheduled-state label.
Why I’m flagging it: Inputs and a status label leave the actual calendar result unshown.
Show the resulting schedule and correction controls, with accurate mobile limitations.
Proposed copy for discussion. These are not current listing fields or tested winners.
Observed listing
A.I. Time and Project Manager
Proposed alternative
Your workspace on the go
Name 23/30 · Subtitle 24/30 charactersRetain the brand and scheduling-related task category while positioning mobile as access to an existing workspace. The wording fits the companion role described by the publisher.
The tradeoff: Calendar and project-manager terms lose explicit subtitle space. The proposal is a clarity hypothesis, not a finding about search demand; subscription and computer requirements still need visible supporting copy.
Read the sequence from top to bottom on mobile, left to right on desktop. These are message-layout sketches, not screens from Motion or tested results.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: A verified phone workspace with concise current account and companion context.
Why it earns the space: Qualify the mobile promise before listing every platform capability.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: The actual duration, deadline and priority controls on iPhone.
Why it earns the space: Explain what information the user supplies.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: The genuine resulting calendar state with the task and fixed events identifiable.
Why it earns the space: Close the input-to-output loop without guaranteeing that every schedule can be completed.
The test: Does a companion-specific first frame attract visitors with more accurate mobile-use expectations? The sketch gives the designer a direction; the actual product and access conditions decide what can ship.
Bring the listing. I’ll help you decide what to keep, what to fix and what to test.
Observed competitor metadata
Visual Calendar & Organizer
Structured centres a daily planner and visual calendar.
The lesson: Motion can explain its companion scheduling role without equating a shared calendar category with the same automation or setup requirements.
Observed competitor metadata
Task manager & Reminders
Todoist combines a to-do list and calendar with task management and reminders.
The lesson: Show what happens to a Motion task after its constraints are entered rather than rely on general task-management language.
Observed competitor metadata
Task remind, planner,countdown
TickTick names lists, calendars and reminders.
The lesson: The task-planning intent overlaps, but a metadata comparison cannot establish that Motion is faster or that the products have identical mobile scope.
Intent candidates grounded in the listing—not fabricated search-volume or difficulty scores.
Visitor’s job: Place work into a calendar using task requirements.
Evidence: The current name and third still support scheduling intent.
Decision: Explain the supported inputs and constraints without promising a perfect day, guaranteed completion or a measured speed gain.
Visitor’s job: Access an existing Motion workspace away from a computer.
Evidence: The description explicitly calls the iPhone app a companion, and the workspace and task screens show mobile access.
Decision: Make account, subscription and computer requirements clear before acquisition.
Visitor’s job: Access notes and documents related to work.
Evidence: The first two stills name notes and documents.
Decision: Verify current creation, recording and editing scope on iPhone before treating every platform feature as a mobile acquisition promise.
The unseen keyword field may already cover some of these terms. Build an evidence-backed keyword shortlist before making a metadata change.
Three 2024 accounts were chosen for schedule adaptation, setup learning and mobile-scope expectations. The short trial is retained and planned integrations are not presented as completed use. Allegations of deliberate targeting or fraud and unverified explanations of the AI system are excluded from factual conclusions.
Sample: 3 selected accounts from 8 displayed reviews. Dates: 18 May 2024–19 September 2024. No sentiment percentage is calculated.
19 September 2024 · 5/5 stars
“to do items shift around”
A September 2024 reviewer valued rescheduling when the day changed and described a recurring payroll task with a completion window.
What I’d investigate: Use the concrete planning job, but do not turn one person’s experience into a deadline guarantee or a measured productivity gain.
Listing review source · Review ID 1173953362818 May 2024 · 5/5 stars
“like 4 days”
A May 2024 new customer liked prioritisation across client projects while still learning task setup and planning to configure Siri.
What I’d investigate: Preserve the short trial and incomplete setup. Planned Siri use is not evidence they had successfully used that integration.
Listing review source · Review ID 1128124591514 June 2024 · 2/5 stars
“compared to even the most basic calendar apps”
A June 2024 reviewer criticised the iPhone experience and listed missing or limited calendar, widget and notification features.
What I’d investigate: Treat the list as historical research questions, not today’s feature matrix. Verify the current mobile scope against the publisher’s companion-app description.
Listing review source · Review ID 11378847136A displayed review can be old, unusually positive or internally inconsistent with its star rating. These accounts suggest questions; they do not establish current defects or typical customer experience. Use the Review Research Desk to keep evidence and interpretation separate.
A long AI list includes an unreleased capability instead of phone-level proof.
Deliverable: Replace it with one currently supported mobile task and a specific benefit.
Creative brief and current-product checkRecent items and workspaces demonstrate access, not completed work.
Deliverable: Show the same task moving from capture into its supported scheduling flow.
Creative brief and current-product checkInputs and a status label leave the actual calendar result unshown.
Deliverable: Show the supported resulting schedule and correction controls, with accurate mobile limitations.
Creative brief and current-product checkDoes a companion-specific first frame attract visitors with more accurate mobile-use expectations?
Check Apple’s current product page optimization guidance and custom product page guidance before configuring a test. Write your experiment brief.
1–3: thumbs down · 4–6: thumbs up and down · 7–10: thumbs up
The basics need a serious rethink.
Too many obvious things have been left unfinished.
There is a useful product here. The listing needs to show it.
Some basics work, but the opening wastes attention and under-explains the benefit.
There is usable creative here, but too much of the sales argument is left to the visitor.
Real strengths, undermined by meaningful gaps in the opening story or execution.
A clear, useful demonstration with specific refinements still needed.
The main promise is clear and supported. Refinement matters more than reinvention.
Clear positioning, thoughtful choices and very few loose ends.
An unusually clear, convincing storefront worth learning from.
An editorial verdict on the captured storefront, not a measured ASO score or an assessment of an agency’s private work.
No private analytics, search-rank dataset or internal keyword field was supplied. Review quotations are short excerpts; explanations are our summaries. App names and screenshots belong to their respective owners. We are not affiliated with Motion. Read our editorial methodology.
Your app. Your priorities.
Send your listing, market and the problem you want to solve. I’ll explain the scope and fee before work starts. Your budget should buy decisions, not a longer PDF.
Build a relevant keyword shortlist, plan your screenshot sequence or get help with the creative decisions.
