ASO AgencyFinance · US iPhone listing
Does their ASO suck?
Listing creative score · first three captured iPhone screenshots
4/10Recognisable. Not convincing.
Goodbudget has an envelope method to explain and chooses to show balances, a pie chart and another chart. The budgeting decision is missing. Reports are useful after someone understands what they are reporting on.
Gab’s verdict · 4/10Gabriel Machuret
One storefront, one language and a dated capture. This is an independent editorial audit, not a client case study.
Gab’s take · Five criteria. Two points each.
The envelope-budget context and balances are useful evidence. Keep the method. The screenshots should show a person assigning money, not leave them guessing how the reports became useful. Show allocating money to an envelope, recording one expense and checking what remains. Enlarge the action and use one clear shared-budget example. Two dated reports do less selling than one understandable budget decision.
Shared budgeting is useful but not demonstrated jointly.
Reports show balances rather than a completed envelope decision.
Repeated blue layouts and small chart labels need stronger hierarchy.
Two reports repeat output without showing budget allocation.
The envelope method provides a specific budgeting approach to evaluate, although the opening demonstrates reports more clearly than allocation.
0: not earned · 1: useful but incomplete · 2: clearly demonstrated. Judged on the dated opening creative; public metadata provides context. These points assess creative execution, not private conversion or ranking performance. Read the scoring criteria · See all ten verdict levels
Inspect the numbered original, read the problem, then compare the proposed fix. The publisher’s creative stays unchanged.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The frame shows allocation categories including food, bills and car expenses, with a negative discretionary balance.
Why I’m flagging it: A single envelope view does not demonstrate collaboration.
Show a shared-budget update or lead with the envelope decision actually pictured.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The chart breaks a sample total into labelled categories and values.
Why I’m flagging it: Category totals do not explain how the budget is set.
Replace this frame with one readable allocation and expense example.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The example includes both negative and positive monthly net figures.
Why I’m flagging it: Monthly comparisons add reporting before an action has been demonstrated.
Show the same envelope's remaining balance and useful next decision.
Proposed copy for discussion. These are not current listing fields or tested winners.
Observed listing
Money & Expense Tracker
Proposed alternative
Plan with budget envelopes
Name 25/30 · Subtitle 26/30 charactersRetain the established budget-planner name and name the method visible in the first frame. The proposed subtitle tells an unfamiliar visitor what kind of planning experience to expect.
The tradeoff: It removes money and expense tracker from the subtitle and repeats budget from the name. That narrower emphasis needs search-intent evidence; it is not automatically better keyword coverage.
Read the sequence from top to bottom on mobile, left to right on desktop. These are message-layout sketches, not screens from Goodbudget or tested results.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: A current allocation step with sample categories and amounts.
Why it earns the space: Explain the method before relying on a balance dashboard.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: A verified shared-budget update and the actual participant context.
Why it earns the space: Demonstrate the headline’s sharing promise without inventing permissions or instant sync.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: The resulting current report tied to the same illustrative transaction set.
Why it earns the space: Connect an action to a useful view without claiming the example is a typical financial outcome.
The test: Does demonstrating an actual shared-budget update clarify the opening promise and improve qualified conversion? The sketch gives the designer a direction; the actual product and access conditions decide what can ship.
Bring the listing. I’ll help you decide what to keep, what to fix and what to test.
Observed competitor metadata
Never worry about money again
YNAB uses a reassurance-led money proposition.
The lesson: Goodbudget can explain its concrete envelope method instead of competing through a guarantee about financial worry.
Observed competitor metadata
Spending, Net Worth, Investing
Monarch names budget tracking with spending, net worth and investing.
The lesson: That breadth differs from the envelope-first creative here. Make Goodbudget’s chosen budgeting method understandable without assuming comparable account coverage.
Observed competitor metadata
Subscription & Expense Manager
Rocket Money foregrounds bills, budgets, subscriptions and expense management.
The lesson: Recurring-charge monitoring is adjacent intent, not the same as allocating an envelope budget. Clarify the first planning action.
Intent candidates grounded in the listing—not fabricated search-volume or difficulty scores.
Visitor’s job: Allocate money into categories before spending.
Evidence: The first screenshot explicitly labels Envelopes and shows category balances.
Decision: Research whether naming the method earlier improves clarity; verify the allocation workflow and avoid promising a financial result.
Visitor’s job: Keep a budget coordinated with another person.
Evidence: The first headline promises sync and sharing, while a selected review describes joint review meetings.
Decision: Verify participant setup, shared data and plan limits before making a household-access claim.
Visitor’s job: Record and review where money goes.
Evidence: The subtitle names expense tracking and the second screenshot is a spending report.
Decision: Explain the current entry and reporting path without assuming automatic bank import or manual-only behaviour.
The unseen keyword field may already cover some of these terms. Build an evidence-backed keyword shortlist before making a metadata change.
Three 2018–2021 accounts were chosen for paper-to-app migration, manual entry and household coordination. Their age is material: none defines current bank import, device limits, subscription terms or debt tools. They provide language for research, not evidence of typical savings or current comparative superiority.
Sample: 3 selected accounts from 8 displayed reviews. Dates: 1 December 2018–21 January 2021. No sentiment percentage is calculated.
21 January 2021 · 5/5 stars
“paper budget ledgers”
A January 2021 reviewer described replacing a paper envelope system and valued reporting and transaction records.
What I’d investigate: Use the workflow motivation; the account’s savings and support-response claims are personal experiences, not measured or current service guarantees.
Listing review source · Review ID 689438962910 January 2019 · 5/5 stars
“enter each one”
A January 2019 reviewer preferred manually entering transactions and described this as supporting awareness.
What I’d investigate: Do not infer today’s bank-connection capability from this old preference. Verify current entry options and keep the receipt-photo request distinct from an existing feature.
Listing review source · Review ID 36352868411 December 2018 · 5/5 stars
“monthly meetings”
A December 2018 reviewer described household budget meetings and different paycheck schedules.
What I’d investigate: Verify current sharing, scheduling and plan limits rather than reproducing old envelope allowances, debt features or personal savings as present facts.
Listing review source · Review ID 3479054471A displayed review can be old, unusually positive or internally inconsistent with its star rating. These accounts suggest questions; they do not establish current defects or typical customer experience. Use the Review Research Desk to keep evidence and interpretation separate.
A single envelope view does not demonstrate collaboration.
Deliverable: Show a supported shared-budget update or lead with the envelope decision actually pictured.
Creative brief and current-product checkCategory totals do not explain how the budget is set.
Deliverable: Replace this frame with one readable supported allocation and expense example.
Creative brief and current-product checkMonthly comparisons add reporting before an action has been demonstrated.
Deliverable: Show the same envelope's remaining balance and useful next decision.
Creative brief and current-product checkDoes demonstrating an actual shared-budget update clarify the opening promise and improve qualified conversion?
Check Apple’s current product page optimization guidance and custom product page guidance before configuring a test. Write your experiment brief.
1–3: thumbs down · 4–6: thumbs up and down · 7–10: thumbs up
The basics need a serious rethink.
Too many obvious things have been left unfinished.
There is a useful product here. The listing needs to show it.
Some basics work, but the opening wastes attention and under-explains the benefit.
There is usable creative here, but too much of the sales argument is left to the visitor.
Real strengths, undermined by meaningful gaps in the opening story or execution.
A clear, useful demonstration with specific refinements still needed.
The main promise is clear and supported. Refinement matters more than reinvention.
Clear positioning, thoughtful choices and very few loose ends.
An unusually clear, convincing storefront worth learning from.
An editorial verdict on the captured storefront, not a measured ASO score or an assessment of an agency’s private work.
No private analytics, search-rank dataset or internal keyword field was supplied. Review quotations are short excerpts; explanations are our summaries. App names and screenshots belong to their respective owners. We are not affiliated with Goodbudget. Read our editorial methodology.
Your app. Your priorities.
Send your listing, market and the problem you want to solve. I’ll explain the scope and fee before work starts. Your budget should buy decisions, not a longer PDF.
Build a relevant keyword shortlist, plan your screenshot sequence or get help with the creative decisions.
