ASO AgencyGames · US iPhone listing
Does their ASO suck?
Listing creative score · first three captured iPhone screenshots
6/10Useful. Still leaving too much unsaid.
Stumble Guys has a better sales pitch hiding behind its logo montage: an actual race with a clear finish objective. Then it shows survival. Good. Let those playable situations do the introduction.
Gab’s verdict · 6/10Gabriel Machuret
One storefront, one language and a dated capture. This is an independent editorial audit, not a client case study.
Gab’s take · Five criteria. Two points each.
The race and survival scenes already demonstrate real play. Keep the colour and energy. The logo montage is the weaker use of space because the playable scenes can introduce the game themselves. The race and survival scenes earn real proof credit, but the logo-led opening wastes a valuable position and keeps the sequence from earning full story points. Lead with the race, then demonstrate a different hazard at a readable scale. The brand already has a logo outside the screenshot gallery.
The logo montage delays an otherwise clear obstacle-game hook.
Controls, race objectives and survival hazards demonstrate play.
Busy landscape scenes make finer information small.
The race and survival scenes add useful variety, but the logo-led opener spends a third of the sample on branding. Two distinct playable situations earn partial credit, not a fully developed opening sequence.
Recognisable obstacle variety supplies a real but familiar genre advantage.
0: not earned · 1: useful but incomplete · 2: clearly demonstrated. Judged on the dated opening creative; public metadata provides context. These points assess creative execution, not private conversion or ranking performance. Read the scoring criteria · See all ten verdict levels
Inspect the numbered original, read the problem, then compare the proposed fix. The publisher’s creative stays unchanged.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The image advertises the brand and variety of settings without showing one complete control interface.
Why I’m flagging it: Several environments surround the logo without explaining one playable action.
Open with a genuine race moment and its immediately readable objective.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The frame shows the objective and available movement controls during a race.
Why I’m flagging it: Scenery competes with the controls and route to the finish.
Crop around one real obstacle and the player's relevant movement choice.
What the visitor sees → what I’d change
Look at the original: The still presents staying on the platforms as a distinct challenge.
Why I’m flagging it: The survival objective works, but platform detail is small.
Enlarge the actual do-not-fall situation while preserving truthful counters and controls.
Proposed copy for discussion. These are not current listing fields or tested winners.
Observed listing
Fun Multiplayer Battle Royale
Proposed alternative
Race, dodge & survive
Name 24/30 · Subtitle 21/30 charactersAdd a recognisable party-game category to the brand and use the subtitle for actions directly supported by the gameplay stills.
The tradeoff: Battle-royale wording leaves the subtitle. This may change how competitive players interpret the game, so audience and query research must justify it independently of the screenshot-order test.
Read the sequence from top to bottom on mobile, left to right on desktop. These are message-layout sketches, not screens from Stumble Guys or tested results.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: Authentic current race gameplay with its objective and controls visible.
Why it earns the space: Explain the first action quickly.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: The verified course montage or current map variety with accurate availability.
Why it earns the space: Expand the world after the task is understood.
Proposed headline
Put this in the frame: The real survival mode with its own objective and sample counter.
Why it earns the space: Show variety without mixing race and elimination rules.
The test: Does leading with the race objective improve newcomer understanding and qualified acquisition? The sketch gives the designer a direction; the actual product and access conditions decide what can ship.
Bring the listing. I’ll help you decide what to keep, what to fix and what to test.
Observed competitor metadata
Play Millions of Games
Roblox foregrounds a broad catalogue of games in its subtitle.
The lesson: Stumble Guys can explain its specific obstacle-and-survival loop instead of competing on the quantity of experiences.
Observed competitor metadata
PvP & 5v5 Battle Royale MOBA
Brawl Stars uses competitive multiplayer and battle-royale terminology.
The lesson: Both appeal to social competitive play, but the mechanics differ. Keep the comparison about clear objectives rather than imply equivalent modes or combat.
Observed competitor metadata
Action
Among Us uses a strong brand name; the captured web listing shows the generic Action category line.
The lesson: Social multiplayer is adjacent intent, not proof of the same gameplay. Do not treat a category fallback as a deliberate keyword-rich subtitle or assume its audience wants obstacle racing.
Intent candidates grounded in the listing—not fabricated search-volume or difficulty scores.
Visitor’s job: Play short competitive rounds with other people.
Evidence: The subtitle names multiplayer and the description describes party play.
Decision: Explain joining and current party requirements; verify supported platforms before promising everyone can play together.
Visitor’s job: Navigate hazards and qualify or survive.
Evidence: The second and third stills explicitly show race and survival objectives.
Decision: Use the concrete gameplay verbs and keep mode-specific rules accurate.
Visitor’s job: Return for familiar courses or organise a session.
Evidence: The montage shows variety and the description promotes friends and events.
Decision: Check current map rotation and party behaviour; old reviews and pictured skins are not evidence of permanent availability.
The unseen keyword field may already cover some of these terms. Build an evidence-backed keyword shortlist before making a metadata change.
Three 2023–2026 accounts were selected for party play, ability and reward expectations, and returning-player map discovery. The deliberately positive star rating on a critical review is preserved. Speculation about bot counts and invented map proposals are not promoted into game facts.
Sample: 3 selected accounts from 8 displayed reviews. Dates: 4 January 2023–17 May 2026. No sentiment percentage is calculated.
4 January 2023 · 4/5 stars
“joining lobbies together”
A January 2023 reviewer liked social play and updates but found racing finals unforgiving after a mistake.
What I’d investigate: Preserve the positive assessment and mode context. Current qualification rules and map rotation still require verification.
Listing review source · Review ID 94718670381 July 2025 · 5/5 stars
“I’m making it 5 stars”
A July 2025 review criticised rewards, ads, abilities and connection behaviour and explicitly said the five-star rating was intended to gain visibility.
What I’d investigate: Retain the rating-body conflict. Allegations of scams, reward manipulation and deliberate misconduct are not verified by this account; use it to investigate access expectations.
Listing review source · Review ID 1284115047517 May 2026 · 5/5 stars
“where did you take workshop”
A May 2026 player asked about workshop and missing modes while proposing several new map ideas.
What I’d investigate: Treat this as uncertainty about feature availability. The suggested plane and tag modes are user inventions, not current game features.
Listing review source · Review ID 14076134403A displayed review can be old, unusually positive or internally inconsistent with its star rating. These accounts suggest questions; they do not establish current defects or typical customer experience. Use the Review Research Desk to keep evidence and interpretation separate.
Several environments surround the logo without explaining one playable action.
Deliverable: Open with a genuine race moment and its immediately readable objective.
Creative brief and current-product checkScenery competes with the controls and route to the finish.
Deliverable: Crop around one real obstacle and the player's relevant movement choice.
Creative brief and current-product checkThe survival objective works, but platform detail is small.
Deliverable: Enlarge the actual do-not-fall situation while preserving truthful counters and controls.
Creative brief and current-product checkDoes leading with the race objective improve newcomer understanding and qualified acquisition?
Check Apple’s current product page optimization guidance and custom product page guidance before configuring a test. Write your experiment brief.
1–3: thumbs down · 4–6: thumbs up and down · 7–10: thumbs up
The basics need a serious rethink.
Too many obvious things have been left unfinished.
There is a useful product here. The listing needs to show it.
Some basics work, but the opening wastes attention and under-explains the benefit.
There is usable creative here, but too much of the sales argument is left to the visitor.
Real strengths, undermined by meaningful gaps in the opening story or execution.
A clear, useful demonstration with specific refinements still needed.
The main promise is clear and supported. Refinement matters more than reinvention.
Clear positioning, thoughtful choices and very few loose ends.
An unusually clear, convincing storefront worth learning from.
An editorial verdict on the captured storefront, not a measured ASO score or an assessment of an agency’s private work.
No private analytics, search-rank dataset or internal keyword field was supplied. Review quotations are short excerpts; explanations are our summaries. App names and screenshots belong to their respective owners. We are not affiliated with Stumble Guys. Read our editorial methodology.
Your app. Your priorities.
Send your listing, market and the problem you want to solve. I’ll explain the scope and fee before work starts. Your budget should buy decisions, not a longer PDF.
Build a relevant keyword shortlist, plan your screenshot sequence or get help with the creative decisions.
