ASO course · lesson 7 of 60

ASO keyword research: discover customer language

Collect useful search and problem language without turning interviews into a validation exercise.

By Gabriel Machuret · Editorial methodology

Before you start: The audience brief and permission to use anonymized research notes.

See the worked example ↓

Module 2: Audience and market research

Speech bubbles and interview notes enter a sculptural head, illustrating user search language.
Gabriel Machuret wearing an ASO Guru T-shirt, listening through a headset with a notebook and pen.

Your instructorGabriel Machuret

About 14 minutes reading · 26 minutes practice

You will produce: A customer-language sheet with quotation, situation, interpretation, use case and evidence type.

Ask about a real situation

An interview is most useful when it reconstructs a recent event. Ask what triggered the need, how the person looked for help, which alternatives they considered and what they expected to happen. Avoid leading with your preferred keyword. “Would you search hiking diary?” mostly measures agreement with the interviewer; “What did you type?” can recover actual language.

Separate quotations from interpretation

Capture the person’s words separately from your summary. Record the context, including whether they are a new user, returning user or someone who abandoned the product. One memorable phrase is a candidate, not proof of common demand. Look for repeated patterns and contradictory examples. Do not silently merge different needs because they share a word such as tracking.

Turn research into testable candidates

A candidate term needs both an audience reason and a product reason. Map each phrase to a use case and the feature that fulfills it. Mark whether the evidence is a recollection, an observed search or an analyst interpretation. This creates an audit trail that survives disagreement and prevents the keyword list from becoming a pile of attractive phrases with no owner.

Quick check · pick a response

Make the call before you scroll.

A customer repeats your suggested phrase. Is it independent evidence of their search vocabulary?
Go deeper: practical decisions and tradeoffs

Recruit for the behavior you need to understand

Choose participants who recently faced the relevant situation, including people who used a different solution or abandoned yours. Existing enthusiasts alone can describe your brand fluently without revealing how a newcomer searches. Write the recruitment criterion before contacting people: for example, someone who tried to record a walk in the last month. Record how they were recruited and which situations are missing. A small interview study can reveal language and mechanisms; it cannot establish how common each need is across the whole market. Treat it as input to keyword and proposition research.

Ask for a recent episode before asking for opinions

Start with “Tell me about the last time you wanted to remember a walk.” Follow the sequence: trigger, search or workaround, alternatives considered, decision and outcome. Ask what words they used before revealing your proposed keywords. “Would you search hiking diary?” invites agreement and contaminates the language you wanted to discover. Request clarification when a term is ambiguous: “What does tracking mean to you here?” It could mean recording memories, monitoring performance or live navigation. Preserve that meaning beside the phrase, because identical words can represent different jobs.

Turn an account into a traceable research input

Separate the participant's exact language from your interpretation. Give the note an anonymous research ID, capture the situation and attach the derived candidate term. Do not convert every phrase into a keyword: some express an objection, a benefit or a product defect instead. Compare recurring themes across accounts while keeping exceptions visible. If everyone uses different words for the same outcome, the research may suggest several seed families. Test those families in the relevant storefront next; interview language alone does not establish search volume or ranking feasibility.

Platform references for this work: Apple — App Store search

Your turn · two-minute exercise

Try the scenario. Make your case.

Rewrite “Would you use an amazing hiking diary?” into three neutral questions about a recent experience. Explain which answers could generate keywords and which would instead change the product or screenshot brief.

Autosaved on this browser. Your work is private and does not sync between devices.

Your step-by-step procedure

From observation to action
  1. Draft five neutral questions about a recent search or product-selection event.

  2. Collect a small exploratory sample across relevant user situations; obtain appropriate consent.

  3. Store anonymized quotations with context and evidence type.

  4. Extract candidate phrases, objections and the product capability associated with each.

Completed example · use the reasoning

From interview to keyword seed

Gabriel’s take: Customers do not speak in your agency’s keyword spreadsheet dialect.

Constructed teaching material, not a client result. Adapt the evidence and product facts before using it for your app.

Transcript

I wanted somewhere to remember our walks with the kids.

Code

Personal memory, family walks, recording

Seed

Walking journal; trip diary

Excluded

Route planner — this interview does not support navigation intent.

Your turn · repair the decision

Make the call. Then compare.

Turn “I keep forgetting where we took those photos” into a coded observation and a cautious seed.

Autosaved on this browser. Your work is private and does not sync between devices.

Explore the supporting case and interpretation

Three Trail Notes users describe “remembering walks,” while one says “planning a route.” Further questioning reveals that the latter expected navigation, which the app does not offer. The team keeps the first language cluster as a research candidate and labels route planning as a mismatch. They do not claim that three interviews establish market search volume. The finding informs the next research step: examine relevant store results and available query evidence.

Interview note: I want to remember our walks

Interpretation: Memory-keeping job

Next research step: Inspect walking journal terms

Interview note: I need to know which turn to take

Interpretation: Navigation job

Next research step: Exclude unsupported routing intent

Interview note: I already use a photo folder

Interpretation: Existing workaround

Next research step: Investigate organization benefit

The first and third observations can support a journaling proposition, but in different ways. One describes the desired outcome; the other suggests the app must justify why it is better than an existing habit. The navigation observation remains valuable even though its terms are unsuitable: it helps the team avoid attracting the wrong audience. Do not count three notes as three votes for a keyword. Their value lies in context, meaning and the next decision they inform.

Build a handover someone can use

Recruitment note

Describe the behavior and time window used to select participants, plus important audiences not represented.

Interview guide

Keep neutral opening questions and probes; mark where the interviewer introduced product language.

Evidence notes

Preserve anonymous IDs, situations and exact phrases separately from your interpretation.

Research outputs

Route each finding to keyword seeds, creative objections or product feedback rather than forcing everything into a keyword column.

Follow-up

State which terms need storefront inspection and which uncertainty needs another participant type.

Your ASO assignment

Use your own app and evidence, or work through the teaching case. Keep your observations separate from assumptions and explain the reasoning behind your decisions.

Build something · track your work

Your assignment checklist

Tick each item after you have produced the work. Reading it does not count. The strategy deck will survive.

0 of 3 tasks checked.

Autosaved on this browser. Your work is private and does not sync between devices. Course completion is recorded separately.

Assess your work

  • Questions recover behavior rather than invite praise.
  • Candidate terms retain their original context.
  • Research limitations and contradictions remain visible.

Common mistakes to catch

  • Inventing customer quotations to make the brief look evidence-based.
  • Treating frequent language in a tiny sample as a search-volume estimate.

Sources and further reading

Platform references reviewed 29 September 2026. These sources support platform capabilities and constraints; the teaching frameworks, assignments and illustrative cases are original course material.

Your ASO lesson notes

Use this space for your assignment, evidence and handover. Your notes save automatically in this browser. Download a copy to take with you.

Notes stay on this device and are not submitted to ASO Agency.

Complete your assignment with the ASO Keyword Research Workbench.

Loading your progress…

Progress is saved only in this browser. It does not sync across devices. Mark a lesson complete after doing its exercise.

Enough theory. Your app next.

Let’s fix what’s holding your listing back.

Send your app link, target market and the problem. We’ll start there.